The use of bone wax versus dermal regeneration matrix for the reconstruction of scalp defects.

BACKGROUND: Secondary intention healing is an alternative to consider in large tumors or tumors located in areas of limited skin mobility, such as the scalp. To promote epithelialization, we can use Dermal Regeneration Matrix (DRM) or bone wax. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of DRM and bone wax in secondary intention healing of cutaneous scalp tumors in elderly patients with comorbidities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of 18 patients with cutaneous scalp tumor healing by secondary intention from February 2022 to April 2023 were analyzed for demographic variables, tumor and surgical characteristics, time from withdrawal of material to complete epithelialization, and need for subsequent surgical intervention. RESULTS: Bone wax was used in 6 patients and DRM in 12. The mean patient age was 84.3 years, and the mean tumor size was 2.7 cm. There were no significant differences in demographics or postoperative complications between the groups. The median time to complete epithelization was 84.5 (60.2-108.7) days in the bone wax group and 105.0 (91.0-126.0) days in the DRM group, with no significant differences (P = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Bone wax is a simple and economical material that can be used for secondary intention healing of scalp tumors in elderly patients with high surgical risk.

Monkeypox outbreak in Spain: clinical and epidemiological findings in a prospective cross-sectional study of 185 cases.

BACKGROUND: Since May 2022, a new outbreak of monkeypox has been reported in several countries, including Spain. The clinical and epidemiological characteristics of the cases in this outbreak may differ from those in earlier reports. OBJECTIVES: To document the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of cases of monkeypox in the current outbreak. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cross-sectional study in multiple medical facilities in Spain to describe the cases of monkeypox in the 2022 outbreak. RESULTS: In total, 185 patients were included. Most cases started with primarily localized homogeneous papules, not pustules, in the probable area of inoculation, which could be cutaneous or mucous, including single lesions. Generalized small pustules appeared later in some of them. Heterogeneous lesions occurred during this generalized phase. All patients had systemic symptoms. Less common lesions included mucosal ulcers (including pharyngeal ulcers and proctitis) and monkeypox whitlows. Four patients were hospitalized, none died. Smallpox vaccination and well-controlled HIV disease were not associated with markers of severity. Contact during sex is the most likely mechanism of transmission. In this outbreak, cases have been described in men who have sex with men and are strongly associated with high-risk sexual behaviours. Seventy-six per cent of the patients had other sexually transmitted diseases upon screening. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical findings in this outbreak differ from previous findings and highly suggest contact transmission and initiation at the entry site. The characterization of the epidemiology of this outbreak has implications for control. What is already known about this topic? Monkeypox eruption is described as consisting of pustules. The roles of HIV and previous smallpox vaccination in the prognosis are unknown. The transmission route was initially described as respiratory droplets and was later suggested to be via sexual contact. What does this study add? Initial lesions at the probable inoculation area were homogeneous and papular (pseudopustules). Generalized small pustules appeared later in some of them. Heterogeneous lesions occurred during this generalized phase. All patients had systemic symptoms. Less common signs included mucosal ulcers (including pharyngeal ulcers and proctitis) and monkeypox whitlows. Well-controlled HIV and previous smallpox vaccination were not associated with severity. No patient died. The data support the hypothesis of transmission via contact during sex. Although this might change, the outbreak is currently limited mostly to men who have sex with men, with high-risk factors for sexually transmitted diseases.

Multicentric Study on High-Frequency Ultrasound Characterization of Calcium Deposits in Dermal and Subcutaneous Calciphylaxis and Calcinosis.

OBJECTIVES: Calcium depositions are frequent in multiple inflammatory dermatosis, they can be explored by ultrasound (US) but the patterns of these depositions have not yet been described. The aim of this study is to describe different patterns of calcium deposition in inflammatory dermatoses. METHODS: The clinical and US data of 58 patients from 7 different centers with inflammatory dermatosis showing ultrasonography-detected calcium depositions was retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Dystrophic calcinosis represented 86.2%, calciphylaxis 8.6%, and metastatic calcinosis 5.2%. Three different sonographic patterns of calcium deposition were found: 1) thin hyperechoic bands, parallel to the surface of the epidermis, generating a strong and wide posterior acoustic shadow; 2) hyperechoic spots or lumps with a narrow acoustic shadow; and 3) a linear hyperechoic band parallel to the walls of a blood vessel with also a narrow acoustic shadow. The predominant pattern in metastatic calcifications was type 1, in dystrophic calcifications type 2, and in calciphylaxis type 3. In dystrophic calcinosis, cutis deposits were longer and wider than in calciphylaxis (P < .05). CONCLUSION: New data on inflammatory dermatoses with calcium deposition may be useful for the diagnosis and monitoring of calcium deposits and could avoid the performance of more invasive tests, such as a skin biopsy.

Ultrasound-guided photodynamic therapy with intralesional methylene blue and a 635 nm light-emitting diode lamp in hidradenitis suppurativa: A retrospective study of 41 patients.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a therapeutic alternative with a good safety profile, but its effectiveness has yet to be demonstrated. OBJECTIVES: To demonstrate the effectiveness of PDT with intralesional methylene blue in HS lesions. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was performed. Forty-one patients were treated with intralesional methylene blue and a diode lamp. Follow-up was carried out at 1 and 6 months after therapy. Efficacy was determined by the diameter reduction of the lesion measured by high-frequency ultrasound. RESULTS: A reduction of ≥75% in the maximum diameter was recorded in 58.5% of the lesions, while 22% showed a reduction between 50% and 75%, and 19.5% showed a reduction of <50%. Recurrence rate was 12.5%. The lesions treated in patients with typical forms of HS (Canoui-Poitrine phenotype I) had a better therapeutic response. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of lesion location or concomitant treatment. CONCLUSION: This therapy may potentially be a cost-effective and well-tolerated local therapy for Hurley I-II patients with superficial abscesses and fistulas.

Dapsone in hidradenitis suppurativa: A case series of 56 patients.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a challenging treatment. Current guidelines reserve dapsone as a third line agent for patients with mild to moderate HS. To our knowledge, only four small case series have been reported. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of dapsone in our clinical practice. A retrospective observational single-center study of 56 HS patients who underwent treatment with dapsone from May 1, 2015, to June 1, 2021, was performed. The Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response (HiSCR) scale was used to evaluate the response to treatment. Fifty-six patients were included, 66% of which were men, with a median age of 33 years. Most of them had mild or moderate disease and belonged to LC2 follicular phenotype. All patients had been refractory to first-line treatments. Dapsone was prescribed at doses of 50-150 mg/day. 62.5% of the patients achieved HiSCR after 12 weeks of treatment. No serious adverse reactions were detected. The median duration of treatment was 8 months. After multivariate analysis, an association was found between the presence of fistulous tracts and the risk of non-response to the drug. In four of the dapsone responders, oral retinoids were added to achieve a sustained response. Limitations include the retrospective and non-controlled nature of this study. In conclusion, dapsone is an effective and well-tolerated option for long-term HS treatment, and in this series, it was mainly chosen for patients with LC2 phenotype. It would be interesting to study combination with retinoids and other management options.

Hydroxychloroquine for Early Treatment of Adults With Mild Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: No effective treatments for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) exist. We aimed to determine whether early treatment with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) would be efficacious for outpatients with COVID-19. METHODS: Multicenter open-label, randomized, controlled trial conducted in Catalonia, Spain, between 17 March and 26 May 2020. Patients recently diagnosed with <5-day of symptom onset were assigned to receive HCQ (800 mg on day 1 followed by 400 mg once daily for 6 days) or usual care. Outcomes were reduction of viral load in nasopharyngeal swabs up to 7 days after treatment start, disease progression up to 28 days, and time to complete resolution of symptoms. Adverse events were assessed up to 28 days. RESULTS: A total of 293 patients were eligible for intention-to-treat analysis: 157 in the control arm and 136 in the intervention arm. The mean age was 41.6 years (SD, 12.6), mean viral load at baseline was 7.90 log10 copies/mL (SD, 1.82), and median time from symptom onset to randomization was 3 days. No differences were found in the mean reduction of viral load at day 3 (-1.41 vs -1.41 log10 copies/mL in the control and intervention arm, respectively) or at day 7 (-3.37 vs -3.44). Treatment did not reduce risk of hospitalization (7.1% control vs 5.9% intervention) nor shorten the time to complete resolution of symptoms (12 days, control vs 10 days, intervention). No relevant adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild COVID-19, no benefit was observed with HCQ beyond the usual care.

A Cluster-Randomized Trial of Hydroxychloroquine for Prevention of Covid-19.

BACKGROUND: Current strategies for preventing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection are limited to nonpharmacologic interventions. Hydroxychloroquine has been proposed as a postexposure therapy to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19), but definitive evidence is lacking. METHODS: We conducted an open-label, cluster-randomized trial involving asymptomatic contacts of patients with polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR)-confirmed Covid-19 in Catalonia, Spain. We randomly assigned clusters of contacts to the hydroxychloroquine group (which received the drug at a dose of 800 mg once, followed by 400 mg daily for 6 days) or to the usual-care group (which received no specific therapy). The primary outcome was PCR-confirmed, symptomatic Covid-19 within 14 days. The secondary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection, defined by symptoms compatible with Covid-19 or a positive PCR test regardless of symptoms. Adverse events were assessed for up to 28 days. RESULTS: The analysis included 2314 healthy contacts of 672 index case patients with Covid-19 who were identified between March 17 and April 28, 2020. A total of 1116 contacts were randomly assigned to receive hydroxychloroquine and 1198 to receive usual care. Results were similar in the hydroxychloroquine and usual-care groups with respect to the incidence of PCR-confirmed, symptomatic Covid-19 (5.7% and 6.2%, respectively; risk ratio, 0.86 [95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.42]). In addition, hydroxychloroquine was not associated with a lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 transmission than usual care (18.7% and 17.8%, respectively). The incidence of adverse events was higher in the hydroxychloroquine group than in the usual-care group (56.1% vs. 5.9%), but no treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Postexposure therapy with hydroxychloroquine did not prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection or symptomatic Covid-19 in healthy persons exposed to a PCR-positive case patient. (Funded by the crowdfunding campaign YoMeCorono and others; BCN-PEP-CoV2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04304053.).